Monday, July 16, 2018

Investigating Cisco's (CSCO) Quest to Bring India Online

The fastest-growing economy in the world, India is projected to see a GDP increase of 7.8% in 2018. The nation is rapidly industrializing, yet still only a third of its population currently resides in an urban environment. There is plenty of opportunity in this region, and Cisco is in an interesting position to capitalize.

The Big Picture

IP-based networking giant Cisco (CSCO ) is based in the US and operates under five main segments: infrastructure platform, applications, security, services, and other. It is the largest player in the networking space and has inked partnerships with a large list of global enterprises including Apple (AAPL ) , IBM (IBM ) and Alibaba (BABA ) .

Cisco India began operations in 1984, and has since filed over a thousand patents and issued 600 for what it calls “innovations across all technologies.” It works with over 2,500 partners in the country and operates 176 networking academies with an overall enrollment of 24,138 active students.

Cisco India works with key domestic firms including Tata Group, Bharti Artel, and multiple provincial government offices. The company’s second largest Global Development Center is based in Bangalore, and houses its research and development, IT, services, and customer support teams, where it develops new business models and technologies for emerging markets, including India.

One key reason why Cisco’s infrastructure platforms are so important to India is because it is still in its infancy. The country boasts a population of 1.32 billion, yet according to data from Statista, only 369 million are connected to the internet. The Indian government is trying to change this through an initiative known as Digital India, a program started in 2015 that seeks to transition the country into a knowledge economy comprised of a digitally literate workforce.

Cisco is one of multiple firms working towards making that a reality. It is leveraging a partnership with telecom giant to power the world’s largest all-IP network.  It includes over 250,000 Cisco routers and will allow Jio to cover 99% of India’s population, laying the basic groundwork to bring the nation online. Cisco began its manufacturing operations in Pune in 2016, and unveiled its first Made-in-India product the following year, predecessor to current routers.

By the Numbers

While this is a worthy cause, what does it mean for the company’s bottom line? In its most recent earnings report, Cisco posted revenues of $12.5 billion on $0.66 in earnings per share, both of which narrowly beat our Zacks Consensus Estimates. While this represents a year-over-year revenue decrease of 4%, EPS still surged 10%.

Cisco noted that its product revenue in India grew by 11% overall in 2017. While Cisco saw declines in other segments, initiatives in India are bearing fruit. The company is aggressively expanding its small business client portfolio, aiming to triple its customer base to 75,000 by 2020. A growing Indian economy includes an increasing number of small businesses, and Cisco has laid the groundwork to capture this opportunity.

Cisco expects the number of internet users in India to reach 829 million by as early as 2021, with the company set to play a major role in the process. The nation still has a long road ahead of it in terms of economic development, but according to a PricewaterhouseCoopers report titled “The World in 2050,” it could surpass the US in GDP by 2050.

Outlook

In recent news, the firm announced plans to acquire July Systems, a private cloud-based mobile application platform. The month before the announcement, it completed the buyout of an AI-based relationship intelligence platform provider, Accompany.

These moves are part of its shift from hardware to software-based products. It is a solid futureproofing method that could increase margins and give the firm a flexible market position. Cisco’s solid net-cash balance of $37.63 billion gives it the ability to pursue various growth initiatives alongside its stock repurchases and dividend hike. The company has raised its buyback program from $25 billion to $31 billion and returned $9.22 billion to shareholders through dividends in fiscal year 2017.

Cisco is a company with a compelling short and long-term investment outlook India. On top of India, it is also collaborating with Open Transit Internet (OTI) firm Orange to expand its network to Africa, Europe, and the Middle East.  Although the acquisition of multiple new firms carries integration risks, and deep macro exposure could make Cisco vulnerable, it is still operating in an overall position of strength, which is reflected in recent earnings estimate revisions.   

In the last 60 days, Cisco has seen six upward and no downward earnings estimate revisions for the current quarter, and nine upward estimates for the current fiscal year compared to one downward estimate. Four analysts have revised estimates downward for the following fiscal year, but twice analysts as many have moved them upward.

Overall, this mixed estimate activity currently leaves Cisco at a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). However, investors should keep in mind that the Zacks Rank performs strongest over a 3-6 month timeframe. Initiatives in India may take years to continue developing, but hold a lot of potential. As such, investors should put the sleeping giant on their radar if they haven’t already.

The Hottest Tech Mega-Trend of All

Last year, it generated $8 billion in global revenues. By 2020, it's predicted to blast through the roof to $47 billion. Famed investor Mark Cuban says it will produce "the world's first trillionaires," but that should still leave plenty of money for regular investors who make the right trades early.

See Zacks' 3 Best Stocks to Play This Trend >>

Friday, July 13, 2018

U.S. Companies In China Losing Patience, Tell Trump 'Enough Is Enough'

&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-42261718&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/42261718/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Peter Navarro, director of the National Trade Council, and President Trump&a;rsquo;s biggest anti-China guru in the White House. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

&a;ldquo;Enough is enough!&a;rdquo;

That&a;rsquo;s what U.S. corporations are telling the Trump administration on Wednesday following a proposed 10% tariff on $200 billion of Made in China goods.

&a;ldquo;The cumulative tariffs that both countries are beginning to implement will harm each other&a;rsquo;s economies and jobs,&a;rdquo; says John Frisbee, president of the U.S. China Business Council, a lobbying firm representing U.S. multinationals in China. &a;ldquo;No one wins in that scenario.&a;rdquo;

Trump slapped $34 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods last week with another $16 billion coming later this month. China retaliated with equal tariffs. The U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said the additional threat of $200 billion, announced after market hours Tuesday, was to punish China for its retaliatory tariffs. China could not even impose an equal value of tariffs on the U.S. if it wanted to. Beijing would have to be more creative. Last year, the U.S. exports to China were valued at $129.8 billion, &l;a href=&q;https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;according to Census data&l;/a&g;.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-42104907&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/42104907/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Robert Lighthizer, U.S. trade representative&a;nbsp;(left) speaks with Peter Navarro. Both men see China the same way Trump does: as a threat to U.S. manufacturing and as an unfair competitor in Asian markets. (Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg.)

On Wednesday, the market was full of headlines speculating on what Xi Jinping could do to retaliate. One way is to attack U.S. services trade&a;mdash;think banks, recently allowed to own mainland broker/dealers outright&a;mdash;and tech companies like Apple. Apple&a;rsquo;s share price fell 1.25% today, worse than the S&a;amp;P 500 and Nasdaq.

&l;p class=&q;tweet_line&q;&g;The U.S. has 6,031 products targeted to hit the $200 billion in new tariffs , according to numbers crunched by Chris Rogers, a research analyst from Panjiva, part of S&a;amp;P Global Market Intelligence. The new proposal is subject to consultation through the end of August. The U.S. China Business Council will have its hands full.

For now, the list is dominated by chemicals, though the products covered are relatively small by value ($7.1 billion, or 3.4% of the $200 billion of imports targeted). Other major categories targeted include textiles (935 lines but notably excluding apparel) and food (925 lines led by fish and vegetables).

By value, the leading categories include electronics ($50.1 billion with 218 tariff lines), capital equipment ($42.0 billion with 200 lines), furniture ($29.7 billion from just 77 lines) and the automotive industry ($12.4 billion with 125 products targeted). The new list comes at the expense of a deeper reliance on China as a supplier for the products concerned, says Rogers.

&a;ldquo;That reduces the options for American buyers to replace Chinese supplies with other overseas providers and increases the risk of supply chain disruptions and higher costs,&a;rdquo; he says.

In the most recent $34 billion list, China accounted for 7.1% of those imports. That rises to 13.3% for the $16 billion list and hits nearly 21% for the $200 billion hit list proposed last night.

For some of the largest products, China&s;s importance as a trade partner is even higher, rising to 49% for IT network gear and a whopping 69.5% for metal furniture.

The tech component &a;ldquo;will likely lead to significant lobbying by IT service companies including Google and Facebook as well as retailers such as Ikea for exclusion of their products,&a;rdquo; Rogers says.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-916059180&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/916059180/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; An investor watches the electronic board at a stock exchange hall in Fuyang, China. The Shanghai 50 Index is in bear territory, down over 20% since January 26. (Photo by VCG/VCG via Getty Images)

&l;p class=&q;tweet_line&q;&g;The U.S. under Trump is currently fighting a multi-theater trade war. Trump has gone after Europe, Mexico and Canada. But he and his two trade sidekicks, Peter Navarro and Robert Lighthizer, are true believers in China mercantilism being bad for U.S. labor. China is the main target.

While China has been good for U.S. consumers, keeping sneakers and toys cheap, it&a;rsquo;s hurt blue-collar labor, which cannot compete in an outsourced economy against the Chinese on an hourly wage and social benefits basis. Many leading Democrats also believe this, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Read the headlines about surging Democrats, and besides being soft on immigration, they are also in favor of tariffs and protecting American workers. The Hillary Clinton wing of the Democratic Party has no argument for the economy, and the free traders in the Republican party will have to turn to think tanks for work. Unless this whole trade-war business blows up in everyone&a;rsquo;s face.

To some, by going after China and other trading partners jointly, Trump makes it harder for countries like Germany or Mexico to side with China because it hurts their own, separate trade talks with the U.S.

&a;ldquo;Trump believes that the best way forward is not to avoid a trade war, but to welcome, embrace, and glorify one because he is firm in his belief that&a;mdash;even though there will be economic contraction and institutional ruin&a;mdash;the United States will emerge better off than Europe, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and&a;mdash;most importantly&a;mdash;China,&a;rdquo; says Daniel J. Ikenson, director of Cato&a;rsquo;s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies. Ikenson does not advocate for Trump&a;rsquo;s position.

Meanwhile, the U.S. China Business Council, which has been patient for the last 18 months, is now worried about a more severe Chinese retaliation.

&a;ldquo;Enough is enough. We need to stop the needless escalation of a tariff war and start working on solutions that will address the real concerns that American companies have about China&a;rsquo;s intellectual property protection and technology transfer policies,&a;rdquo; says Frisbee. &a;ldquo;Those are the right issues to focus on, but tariffs are the wrong way to solve them.&a;rdquo;

For Trump, tariffs are the only way to bring people to the table. Only then, if all goes well, will problems get solved.

On Wednesday, famed investor Mark Mobius said a trade war marked the beginning of the global economy&a;rsquo;s march towards financial crisis. He predicted a 10% drop in emerging market equities this year, led by further deterioration out of China.

China&a;rsquo;s mainland equity markets are already down over 20% from their January 26 highs. Investors are likely to pile into the A-shares if Shanghai and Shenzhen fall another 20%. If another $200 billion worth of tariffs are imposed by September, an additional decline of that magnitude is not that hard to imagine.

&a;nbsp;&l;/p&g;